Difference between revisions of "Talk:Hyksos Constitution - Exile"
Peacefulness (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Please leave any comments you have below. Signing your name and the day/time (use UTC) is not required, but is recommended as I may wish to contact you. | Please leave any comments you have below. Signing your name and the day/time (use UTC) is not required, but is recommended as I may wish to contact you. | ||
| − | + | ---- | |
| + | Overall - I would like to see a layout that summarizes things before going into behavior and THEN go into detail (otherwise it sounds very harsh to just read Griefing, as interpreted by an elder, is exilable). Something like "Hyksians should take a moment to learn the Code of Conduct, which follows the basic premise that: intentional action detrimental to society is subject to a 3 strike law, as interpreted at the sole discretion of the Elders, with increasing visibility to the public as violations are reviewed..." (tehm, 8:50pm PDT, 22 March 2018)<br> | ||
| + | ---- | ||
Comment on Section 1 – Behaviors worthy of Exile, iv. Intentionally sabotaging faction goals (Peacefulness, 2 am UTC, 23 March 2018)<br> | Comment on Section 1 – Behaviors worthy of Exile, iv. Intentionally sabotaging faction goals (Peacefulness, 2 am UTC, 23 March 2018)<br> | ||
| − | While recognizing the previous statement, "Only major offenses should be worthy of an exile", this justification for a player's removal from a faction makes me nervous. There is plenty of room for interpretation regarding what the faction's goals are. An individual who does not agree with an elder over something such as the factional control of the region they live in, may choose to knowingly pay tribute at their region's post, and be repeatedly accused of "sabotaging faction goals" because they wish to be an active part of their faction and retain access to faction chat while they are in their camp. | + | While recognizing the previous statement, "Only major offenses should be worthy of an exile", this justification for a player's removal from a faction makes me nervous. There is plenty of room for interpretation regarding what the faction's goals are. An individual who does not agree with an elder over something such as the factional control of the region they live in, may choose to knowingly pay tribute at their region's post, and be repeatedly accused of "sabotaging faction goals" because they wish to be an active part of their faction and retain access to faction chat while they are in their camp. +1 tehm |
---- | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | Section 1 - "Harassment/griefing of one or more players" -- I think something needs to call out egregious or repeated griefing. When acro opened, acroers took over Hyksos chat with "OPEN!" comments from the acro blob. One person took offense to this and would go stand next to those people to try to get them to get off Hyksos chat. She felt her right to chat was being disrupted by acroers, but technically she was the one griefing. Should she really be subject to expulsion right there? (tehm, 8:50pm PDT, 22 March 2018)<br> | ||
Revision as of 04:29, 23 March 2018
Please leave any comments you have below. Signing your name and the day/time (use UTC) is not required, but is recommended as I may wish to contact you.
Overall - I would like to see a layout that summarizes things before going into behavior and THEN go into detail (otherwise it sounds very harsh to just read Griefing, as interpreted by an elder, is exilable). Something like "Hyksians should take a moment to learn the Code of Conduct, which follows the basic premise that: intentional action detrimental to society is subject to a 3 strike law, as interpreted at the sole discretion of the Elders, with increasing visibility to the public as violations are reviewed..." (tehm, 8:50pm PDT, 22 March 2018)
Comment on Section 1 – Behaviors worthy of Exile, iv. Intentionally sabotaging faction goals (Peacefulness, 2 am UTC, 23 March 2018)
While recognizing the previous statement, "Only major offenses should be worthy of an exile", this justification for a player's removal from a faction makes me nervous. There is plenty of room for interpretation regarding what the faction's goals are. An individual who does not agree with an elder over something such as the factional control of the region they live in, may choose to knowingly pay tribute at their region's post, and be repeatedly accused of "sabotaging faction goals" because they wish to be an active part of their faction and retain access to faction chat while they are in their camp. +1 tehm
Section 1 - "Harassment/griefing of one or more players" -- I think something needs to call out egregious or repeated griefing. When acro opened, acroers took over Hyksos chat with "OPEN!" comments from the acro blob. One person took offense to this and would go stand next to those people to try to get them to get off Hyksos chat. She felt her right to chat was being disrupted by acroers, but technically she was the one griefing. Should she really be subject to expulsion right there? (tehm, 8:50pm PDT, 22 March 2018)